Due to variations in body type, experiences and culture, every person has a different definition of comfort. Yet, standards such as ASHRAE 55 continue to be written based on static, linear models, regarding occupants as receptors of their environments instead of active participants in it.[1]These standards are also based upon gender-biased data, often leaving women to live and work in environments designed for their male counterparts. A 2015 study published by Nature Climate Changestated that “buildings should ‘reduce gender-discriminating bias in thermal comfort’ because setting temperatures at slightly warmer levels can help combat global warming”[2]during summer months.Not only is thermal comfort an issue of inclusivity and equality, but also of energy usage and sustainability. It is the responsibilityof thermal comfort standards to share accountability for promoting sustainable buildings during a time of increasing pollution and rates of climate change.[3]Emphasis on thermal comfort has a growing importance in architecture through its potential significant impact on productivity, attendance, equality and sustainability.
Read More